Skip to: Navigation | Content | Sidebar | Footer

Weblog Entry

Click Here

February 21, 2003

‘Click here to continue.’

‘For more information, Click Here.’

‘’50% off your favourite gizmo. Click Here!’

Click below for more.

The paradigm continues today. Every good web design book/site will tell you that using the words ‘click here’ should be avoided at all costs, and they have been since the beginning of the web.

The hyperlink interface is well–established and easy to use: if you hover your mouse over a link, the cursor will change, indicating that this can indeed be clicked. This is a simple, yet effective system that rarely needs to be improved.

Why then do many designers continue to direct users to click on these links? The simple reason is that the call to action appeals to marketing types. A simple stand–alone image that isn’t an obvious link will get overlooked. Anything not garnering traffic is bad; we can’t rely on people to find what they want, we must tell them what they should have.

Haven’t we been here though? Didn’t we learn anything from the ‘push’ technology experiment? The web is not TV; we do not tell people where to go. The web is interactive, and its users dictate their own path. The beautiful thing is that if we don’t like something, we go somewhere else.

Instead of spending all our time finding new ways to direct our users to information we want them to see, we should instead be providing them content that they truly want. ‘Click Here’ is a sure sign that the information we can expect to find behind the link is something an advertiser wants us to see, and is rarely worth our time.

Reader Comments

haze says:
April 09, 01h

user are idiots. most targeted audiences are idiots.’s shoe configurator initially allowed ppl to scroll down the iframe. the nike bigwigs were scared that their targeted audience didnt understand how to SCROLL, so they made the page JUMP from target to target… sometimes disorienting the more advanced users.

there are ppl who are too stupid to scroll down a browser. sure, developing for intelligent users sounds good in theory, but in a business perspective, there are more idiots in this world than brilliant, to large companies, the idiot market wins.